Friends of McMillan Park: What happened in McMillan case before the DC Court of Appeals

From: HistoricWashington@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 12:56 AM
To: HistoricWashington@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [HistoricWashington] What Happened in McMillan Case Before DC Court of Appeals

Preserve, restore, and reopen McMillan Park for the people. View this email in your browser.

FRIENDS of McMILLAN PARK What Happened in the DC Court of Appeals with the McMillan Case on September 20th?  Dear Friend of McMillan Park, Last Tuesday, September 20th, was the long-awaited date to present oral arguments in our case before the DC Court of Appeals, seeking to right the wrongs done in the zoning and preservation process concerning McMillan Park.  We remain optimistic, but we must wait for the court's written decision on this matter that likely will not appear until January 2017 or so.  But out of a desire to share with our supporters who were unable to attend or watch the proceedings online (and there were many who were able to join us at the court or view the proceedings online!), here is a press release we have issued concerning the court proceedings last Tuesday.  We have done our work and of course hope that the judges will see merit in our presentation, oral and written, for the sake of some much better planning for the future of our park.  We are hoping that this press release will be picked up by some in the local media, but we want to share this with you, too, for all our work depends on your interest and support. #### (text of press release)#### HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMUNITY COMES OUT IN FULL FORCE TO STOP THE MAYOR FROM DESTROYING  MCMILLAN PARK City Outsources Defense of its own Zoning, Preservation Decisions A virtual who’s who of the historic preservation community in Washington came to support the lawsuit designed to halt the deeply flawed development plan approved by the Mayor and the City Council that would lead to the destruction of the historic McMillan Sand Filtration Plant in Ward 5. An amicus brief to the lawsuit originally brought by Friends of McMillan Park was filed jointly by The Committee of 100 on the Federal City, and the DC Preservation League. The lawsuit was also joined in part by the McMillan Coalition for Sustainable Agriculture, and DC for Reasonable Development.. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, was a party at the administrative hearings and had also previously submitted public testimony to the National Capital Planning Commission and Zoning Commission citing erroneous assertions by the NCPC concerning the obstructed view of the Capitol from President Lincoln’s Cottage. “Speaking as a lawyer, it seemed to me that the court expressed concern about the justifications of the Zoning Commission and the Mayor’s Agent decisions to move forward with the dense development of the site,” said Tony Norman, local attorney, founder and chairman of the McMillan Park Committee, responsible for working to have the site added to the DC Inventory of Historic Sites.  “The court also raised important concerns about the Zoning Commission’s failure to address the gentrification impacts of the project.” Curiously, the city did not file its own brief in the Court of Appeals and did not send any of its own lawyers to defend the decisions of the DC Zoning Commission or the Mayor’s Agent for Historic Preservation, but instead outsourced this work to the law firm representing the proposed developer, Vision McMillan Partners.  While this is apparently perfectly legal, does the city not care enough to defend its own decisions? The outsourced law firm presumably will send its bill to the city, which has already paid about one million dollars to this firm under its exclusive rights agreement to develop the McMillan site.. The case ended up in the District Court of Appeals as a result of a lawsuit filed by Friends of McMillan Park to challenge the DC Zoning Commission and the Mayor’s Agent for Historic Preservation decisions to approve the high density McMillan development plan even though it ran roughshod over many local historic preservation and zoning regulations in force. “I am astounded,” said Mary Pat Rowan, Ward 5 resident, landscape architect, and Committee of 100 member, “The administration of Mayor Bowser no longer even pretends that it is something other than a wholly owned subsidiary of Vision McMillan Partners. You sue the city, and VMP lawyers—the most expensive in town—defend the city. And the taxpayer is stuck with the tab. This is not a government of checks and balances, but a government of bank checks and bank balances. The people of the city are not only swindled, but their patrimony is slated for demolition.” “We didn’t see a single citizen sitting with the lawyers representing the city’s development at the hearing,” noted Kirby Vining a director with Friends of McMillan Park, a lead plaintiff in the case. “By contrast, it was a happier day across the aisle from the blue suits where over 60 dedicated McMillan supporters came out to support the fine efforts of lawyers Andrea Ferster and Jason Klein who made professional, measured and precise points before the judges to support our case that the zoning and preservation processes in this case were deeply flawed and should be thrown out. We don’t know what the court will ultimately decide, but we do know that in the court of public opinion, we have made a strong case that resonates with the people.” ### Thank you for your continued interest and support,  John Salatti, Kirby Vining, and Hugh Youngblood Board of Directors, Friends of McMillan Park, Inc. If you have any questions, please contact restoremcmillan@gmail.com or call 202.213.2690.   Contribute to the Save McMillan Park Legal Fund DONATE NOW SHARE THIS EMAIL FOLLOW on TWITTER JOIN on FACEBOOK

unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences  Copyright © *|2013|* *|Friends of McMillan Park|*, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: Friends of McMillan Park 16 Franklin Street NE Washington, DC 20002

Posted by Daniel Goldon Wolkoff