Tuesday, August 05, 2014

four new pics from Vision McMillan Partners

These tweets and pics just came out from Vision McMillan Partners:


7 comments:

Todd said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
eylngrl said...

Funny how the neighborhood thinks this is an abomination and yet additions to homes that are unsympathetic to the existing pattern on our streets due to poor design or incompatible material use are not seen as affecting the neighborhood's character in the long run.

TheCommiss said...

Amen!

Citizenalpha said...

I disagree - I very much think those homes in your second example do affect the neighborhood's character. Unfortunately, the current status quo is that one you can do something about since there's public forums to voice opinions. The other, as angry as one can be, unfortunately doesn't have a zoning hearing or require ANC approval, you just need a good permit expediter with friends in DCRA.

eylngrl said...

So true. thats why we need to come together and support the regulations that are being offered for the R-4 District or push for the conservation district tools in order to exercise some control on the designs and material use that some developers believe fit with the neighborhood's character. There just needs to be some compatibitiy.

Unknown said...

Very well said by Citizenalpha.

In one case we're talking about something for which the community should have some say, as it's public land. In the other, we're talking about a person's private property with no mechanism to oppose a project.

I get the sense that Bloomingdale will actively pursue establishing a conservation district but, as representatives from the Office of Planning stated last month, we cannot do so until those laws are put into place. That could be 6-months or it could be 2-years.

Mat

Robin Buck said...

The first rendition looks like a mausoleum. The second is a monstrosity of another sort. Both are totally out of scale with the neighborhood and the character of this historic property.