Friday, June 07, 2013

open letter regarding McMillan to VMP, Friends of Millan, and the greater Bloomingdale community

See this open letter from Jeff Morrow:

To the Vision McMillan Partners, Friends of McMillan, and the greater Bloomingdale community,

I write because I feel like a voice has been absent from the increasingly destructive discussion surrounding plans for McMillan.

Though I’m wary of claiming to represent any group of people, I sense that there are many residents like myself who are increasingly repelled by the tenor of the discussion, who do not see the debate as humanity’s last stand against tyranny, and who would like to see a reasoned and respectful dialogue on how to best utilize the McMillan site.

Many of us would love to turn McMillan into a world-class park destination, verdant and with high-end public facilities; the Collage City plan is undeniably beautiful. We are, however, skeptical that such a goal is feasible, and we worry that rejecting other solutions while trying to will such a thing into being would end up perpetuating the status quo: an aesthetically interesting, but inaccessible no-man’s-land that partitions our neighborhoods.

We are nonetheless open to persuasion and discussion, with no axe to grind. We have concerns about the VMP plans, as well as a healthy skepticism of our city government and its relationship to corporate developers.

I have, since first being approached to sign the McMillan petition, sought to educate myself on the issue. I have watched video of the HPRB meetings, read the websites and releases of VMP and FoM, read coverage from local blogs, read the DC Regs at 10-A2016, etc.

With that in mind, I pose a list of open questions that none of the existing material resolves. The answers to these questions would genuinely help us to know where we stand on the issue, in a way that propaganda and creative hashtags cannot.


Questions for VMP

(1) To what extent are your most recent plans---specifically the parts involving greenspace and mixed-income housing---guarantees, and to what extent are they subject to change? Under what conditions, if any, would they be subject to change after final approval by the city? What would be developed first, the office buildings or the green space?  Put simply, what defenses do the community and the District have against a bait-and-switch?

(2) Do you plan to make any further changes pursuant to the suggestions of the HPRB in their April hearing? At what point do you consider your design final?

Questions for FoM

(1) How much would an alternative plan like Collage City (or similar) cost? And who would fund it? Are there any potential public/private partnerships? Are there projections for revenue it could generate?

(2) Is there any indication from the city that they’d ever be amenable to such a project? Are there any (non-ANC) elected officials who have expressed support for the Collage City plan or any alternative? Is there any precedent in DC for a project like the Collage City plan?

(3) Is there any indication that the VA would be open to turning over the land north of Michigan, as indicated in the Collage City plan?

(4) Affordable housing is a serious concern as the housing stock in Bloomingdale steadily changes hands from lower income to higher, often with a developer in between. Is there any plan for genuinely mixed-income housing to be added under any FoM-supported alternative scenario?

(5) Fact sheets and press releases claim the VMP development would produce "gridlock traffic"; is that based on a numerical estimate, or is it speculative?

(6) Is the city under any contractual obligation to VMP? If so, is the expectation that they’ll renege on the contract and face liability, or that they’ll pay VMP to exit?

These are earnest questions that would be useful to citizens like myself who are looking to make informed choices. We may not see the issue as one of apocalyptic significance, but we care deeply about our community and hope to remain productively engaged.

And if you're still reading, thank you.

Jeff Morrow

3 comments:

Todd said...

I am likewise a party that is somewhat in the middle between the extremes. I own a house in Bloomingdale, but I live in Africa now, but I closely monitor what's going on because I lived and will live again in my house in Bloomingdale.

It seems undeniable to me that to get to a world class site, you will need foundation funding. VMP will not do this. Is there a way to get VMP just to take it's hands off the park portion and let the community shop that part to foundations for a more spectacular development? Something more along the lines of the Collage City plan.

Even if it's possible to fund something more high end in the park portion of this plan, ...the current architecture of the rest of the site just doesn't seem appropriate or acceptable given the quality of the site. So while i really have no objections to what they propose on any portion, I would be looking for some very specific things: Brick buildings....probably something more like P street (near Whole Foods) and Chancellor's Row than like the office park that's now proposed. EYA built very nice rowhouses in Chancellor's Row that would be appropriate to this site rather than the grotesque prefab units they are proposing. The buildings should be brick factory loft style rather than a glass and steel office park. or try something like the Tivioli center with the clay tile roof...that would be more site/historically appropriate. Who in their right minds wants more of the architectural abomination that is the Washington Hospital Center? It seems they really want some sort of furturistic look/feel, but without actually spending the money to get to "visionary" so that the result looks cheap and like a throwback to postmodern france. The "service courts" should also be brick....not the huge white expanses of concrete that are there now. Pebble walkways are fine...just like on the national mall. Instead of grids everywhere, why not make things more organic? Here are a just a few of the ways to make this plan redeemable. It's not actually that far off, but it seems that VMG is either out of ideas or they just don't (can't) get to this sort of plan that will garner broader support. I can't for the life of me understand why they keep proposing things that just raise the ire of the community when it seems like the solution is so clear to me.

Perhaps if VMP was relieved of the park portion they would have additional funds to sink into the other parts to make a more harmonious development?

Unknown said...

Dear Mr. Morrow,

Thank you for your thoughtful questions. We will prepare a set of detailed responses to your RFI and submit them to the public forum for discussion as soon as possible.

Please let us know as additional questions arise.

Sincerely,

Hugh Youngblood
Friends of McMillan Park
202.630.2262
friendsofmcmillanpark@gmail.com

Anonymous said...

Mr. Morrow captures my sentiments exactly. I recently moved to Bloomingdale and live about a block away from the site. I generally agree with FOM on most points, particularly their "power conceives nothing without a demand" approach of needing to fight for every ounce of community benefit that VMP "offers" us. Assuming they do manage to delay or stop this though, will they fight as ferociously FOR something as they do AGAINST something? The chain link fence staying up indefinitely for years is as much a failure by FOM as it is a symbol of the institutional incompetence of our city government.