Saturday, June 01, 2013

revised Friends of McMillan Park message: "McMillan Developers Launch Biased, Flawed Internet Survey"

Friends of McMillan Park
 
For Release: May 31, 2013
Contact: Erin Fairbanks, 240-506-6777, erinwhite@yahoo.com
 

 
  McMillan Developers Launch Biased, Flawed Internet Survey
 
The developers chosen to develop the historic McMillan Sand Filtration Site have suddenly discovered the need to determine what the nearby community (and everybody else) really wants for the site.  A full seven years after signing an “Exclusive Rights Agreement” with the District Government and presenting their plan to overdevelop the site at countless official and unofficial meetings, Vision McMillan Partners (VMP) has sent out, via the Internet and social media, a survey that is both flawed and biased.
 
Unlike the 2012 Community Survey that employed generally accepted methodologies for survey design, the VMP/District survey is subject to these design flaws:
 --Ballot-stuffing: survey takers are not identified; anybody on the Internet can “vote early and vote often”;
 --Unfocused: this survey has no mechanism to disaggregate the data collected so that anyone can determine where respondents are from: (1) the surrounding community, (2) Ward 5, (3) the District, or (4) anywhere on the Internet;
 --Exclusivity: the survey is apparently being conducted only via e-mail and at selected meetings, and thus many people, particularly older, long-term residents will be left out.
--Biased questions: some questions offer false choices between either the VMP/District’s poor development or no development at all, and other questions offer many options but limit answers to “choose only three,” automatically diluting the number and intensity of the concerns people have. 
 
“Why is VMP and the District Government all of a sudden doing this survey after seven years of trying to sell us on their plan to overdevelop McMillan?,” asked John Salatti, a Bloomingdale resident, former ANC Commissioner, and member of The Friends. “Are they finally realizing that the Community Survey's rigorous door-to-door survey last year and the hundreds of petition signatures we have collected, both for more park and less development, shows what people really want?” 
 
Community members completed its comprehensive, unbiased, door-to-door survey over a year ago and presented the results to Mayor Gray, the City Council, including Ward 5 Councilmember Kenyan McDuffie, and to neighborhood and civic associations.  The survey showed that a majority of neighbors want over 50% park and preservation of the underground cells and above-ground silos.   The VMP/District plan, in contrast, calls for an undistinguished, suburb-like development with 12-story office buildings on the north, massive automobile traffic at North Capitol Street and Michigan Avenue and destruction of most the underground water filtration caverns and above-ground structures and minimal contiguous park space.
 
“This flawed VMP/District Government survey is one more reason for Mayor Gray to cancel the June 6 meeting on declaring McMillan surplus,” said Salatti. “When we meet with Councilmember McDuffie next week, we will ask him to join our appeal to the Mayor.”

2 comments:

TheCommiss said...

OMG I have heard it all now in Bloomingdale. Erin you have completely lost your mind. you must be new to the area, because your complete lack of knowledge is extremely apparent. First of all that community survey that Mr. Mueller did wasn't bais. Give me a break. You're just another new comer who has joined the rest of the NIMBY's to stop any development at McMillan AGAIN! You're a progressive right...that's just what I hate! White new residents who hide behind a banned of progressive without considering anything or anyone else and the exact reason that progressive will accomplish nothing in DC. when you realize that you are not the only one with an opinion and an interest and are willing to come to the table with rational needs and wants and willing to meet others half way, then and only then will this city begin to listen. Until then you're wasting your hot air!

Unknown2 said...

II think the community survey was extremely biased, in how it was conducted (coerced), questions asked (strongly slanted) and with the associated propaganda that accompanied the survey and the ANC rep as he begged people to sign it.

Look at the inaccurate inforation i the flyer that Hugh just put out. scaring people with "tyson corner" stories, scareing people by saying destroy over 90% of greenspace and historic structures. Hugh knows these are all lies. Why hid behind these lies? just tell the truth and let all honest opinions come forth.

i this is truly bad, then it will be obviously bad, there would not need to be an army of activists spreading biased untruths about the size, scope and destruction of nature.

Just play fair folks and see what the community wants naturally, not from being scared and coerced.