I
acknowledge that the topic of the DC Zoning rewrite, dubbed the Zoning Regulations
Review (ZRR), is boring.
But
it * is * important.
One
of the options provided is neighborhood customized zoning.
See
the article below from Alma Gates in the February 2013 Palisades News
newsletter.
Any
interest perhaps in pursuing customized zoning in Bloomingdale?
Early
in the Zoning Regulation Revision (ZRR) process, the Georgetown Citizens
Association (CAG) began meeting with the Office of Planning (OP) to design ``customized``
residential zones for their historic neighborhood. As a result, two new residential zones appear
in the current ZRR draft.
Since
the beginning of the ZRR process, OP has said it would consider neighborhood
customization. After all, neighborhoods help define the city and should have
the option to set development standards that protect their unique
characteristics.
When
asked recently about the customization process, Harriet Tregoning, Director of
the Office of Planning, said the Office of Planning wants to see support from
the citizens association and the ANC as well as data to support requests for
customization.
As
a resident of Palisades eager to inform the community of the customization
option, the linked article below was submitted for the February issue of the
Palisades News.
Alma
Gates
Zoning
Task Force Member
One
Neighbor's Opinion
Special
Zoning Protections Are Needed for the Palisades
Editor’s
Note: Alma Gates appeared before the membership at the October meeting, and
made a comprehensive presentation on the onging process of revising and updated
the city’s zoning regulations. She has
now submitted this article urging special zoning restrictions for the
Palisades.
Alma
represented the “central Palisades” on ANC 3D from 2003 through 2008. Currently
she serves as a Trustee of the Committee of 100 on the Federal City, and as chair
of its Zoning Subcommittee. In that
capacity, she was appointed to and serves on the District’s Zoning Regulation
Revision Task Force. The Palisades is
fortunate indeed that Alma is so well-placed to engage with a process that
could so significantly affect our neighborhood.
In
her 2005 book, “The Palisades of Washington, DC,” Alice Fales Stewart details
the rich history of our neighborhood and the geographic area in which it is
situated. She notes, “… the Palisades
maintains a stable residential population and enjoys a friendly, small-town
atmosphere.” Later, in a landmark
nomination for a Palisades property, Mary Rowse wrote, “Long a rural enclave
within Washington, DC's limits…, the Palisades began as a pathway between the
wharves and warehouses of Georgetown, the farmlands of Montgomery County, and
points further west.
Development
in the Palisades followed the typical streetcar suburb pattern of continuous
corridors, unlike the railroad suburb pattern of nodes around stations. Because streetcars made numerous stops at
short intervals, developers platted rectilinear subdivisions on small
lots.” In addition, much of the original
building stock throughout the Palisades is unique because many homes were ordered
from catalogues and constructed from kits.
It is the small town atmosphere, building scale and affordability of
Palisades’ housing that make the area so attractive to young families and keeps
long-term residents here for generations.
One
of the questions Palisades residents ask most often is, “What can Palisades do
to protect the neighborhood from new, out of scale residential construction?”
or, How can Palisades maintain its small town atmosphere while permitting new
construction throughout the neighborhood?
Residents
recognize that each time a Palisades house is torn down, a scar is left in the
community’s original building fabric; but,
concern isn’t about new construction itself, it’s more about the scale and
relationship of the new to what currently exists. It’s about the obvious change in the
streetscape. Even though the new
construction may be within zoning regulations, much of the building stock in
Palisades dates back to the first two decades of the 20th century and is of a
very different height scale than homes built in recent years.
New
homes dot the landscape of many streets in Palisades, but recent construction
of a three-story home on a neighborhood street has triggered real concern as it
follows on the heels of four new three-story houses right around the
corner. The new construction completely
overshadows smaller two-story neighbors.
These new houses may fit within the R-1-B zoning envelope that allows height
up to 40 ft and lot occupancy of 40 percent, but because the height of
surrounding older homes is considerably less than 40 ft. there is concern about
the effect on the light and air of neighboring properties. One of the “side effects” of too-tall
buildings is the shadows they create.
Plants that require full sun, can no longer thrive when placed in shadow
or shaded sun for most of the day.
Residents
need to be aware that a new zoning code is in the process of being finalized
and it offers no additional protections against out of scale construction on
residential lots. One option offered by
the Office of Planning is to allow neighborhoods to customize certain
provisions of the zoning regulations and thus maintain the residential
character and height scale of the neighborhood.
For example, The Georgetown Citizens Association (CAG) and ANC 2E worked
jointly to set a height limit of 35 vs. 40 feet in Georgetown after gathering
data on a number of blocks. It was determined
that 35 ft. is the predominant height for homes in the area. In addition, they proposed that a property be
permitted to have a maximum height of forty feet if a property adjacent on
either side has a building height of forty feet or greater.
Perhaps
the questions for the Palisades Citizens Association are: Does the membership want to preserve the Palisades
neighborhood’s scale and character; and, What role can the PCA play in ensuring
that happens?
Throughout
the zoning revision, the Office of Planning has stated, “Neighborhoods can
customize the proposed zoning regulations to fit their specific area.” In effect a zone would be created that would
contain the special provisions to be applied to the zone.
Height,
which could also be limited by number of stories, is one provision that
Palisades might want to include in its customization of a zone. While the options are many and varied, this
customization should not be looked upon as an endless wish list. Any customization will require data to back
up the change and that will require input from and effort on the part of
Palisades residents.
The
neighborhood is at a crossroads – identify and preserve those characteristics
that make Palisades one of Washington’s unique neighborhoods, or continue to
permit new development that will eventually change its scale and
character.
Those
who attended the Ward 3 Zoning Regulation Revision presentation heard the
Office of Planning state that customization requests are welcome but must have
the support of the citizens association and the ANC. ANC 3D was made aware of the customization
option at its January meeting. A
decision on whether to move forward with data collection and support
customization of zoning for the neighborhood is needed by the membership of the
Palisades
Citizens Association at its March meeting.
This timing will allow the ANC to vote and present a resolution in
support of Palisades customization to the Office of Planning in April when it is
anticipated the text of the new regulations will be forwarded to the Zoning
Commission for approval. Once the
proposed zoning regulations have been approved by the Zoning Commission it will
be far more difficult to create a special neighborhood zone.
No comments:
Post a Comment