Subject: VMP McM Proffers in PUD format
From: alc@envisionmcmillan.com
To: 5E04@anc.dc.gov
Chairperson Pinkney and Commissioners of ANC 5E,
I am attaching the draft version of VMPs community amenities offered for McMillan inclusive of items agreed to in the negotiation session Thursday night, May 22nd. At your request we worked from MAG recommendations and the resolution ANC 5E drafted providing our comments, agreement and counter offers, but as we mentioned Thursday night, this is the standard format required for the written PUD order.
Hence, this is the document we will submit to the Zoning Commission tomorrow.
I have also included a sample construction management plan as referenced in the proffers document.
I have cc'd Scot Roberts and hence he may post these documents to the Bloomingdale Blog.
Best,
Anne Corbett
Project Director
VISION MCMILLAN PARTNERS
EYA · JAIR LYNCH Development Partners · Trammell Crow Company
202.494.7523 | alc@envisionmcmillan.com | @VisionMcMillan
2 comments:
Does anyone see anything new in here? This appears to be the same set of amenities/benefits captured in the original submission by VMP to the Zoning Commission and deviates significantly both from the ANC 5E request and MAG request.
Mathew Bader
BCA MAG Representative
Well, i do see that they added the spray ground, playground in point #2. I also see that in point 13e: they commit to a Park between the silos and the park....with cafe..etc. OVER a period of 10 years.
In general this thing needs to be laid out more explicitly and parsed legally. ...the language is so broad and vague as to be able to drive a truck through the loopholes in the language. They don't for instance commit to making that space a Pedestrian throughway....they don't mention taking the traffic off of it...etc. They could just reserve it, say on Fridays, for markets and the rest of the time it is used for traffic.
Post a Comment