Tuesday, February 03, 2015

"North" Bloomingdale gentrified in the 2000's, while "south" Bloomingdale is not eligible to gentrify (because it was gentrified in the 1990's)

Note the census tract north of Rhode Island Avenue NW in Bloomingdale is labeled as gentrified.
     
And note that the census tract south of Rhode Island Avenue NW in Bloomingdale is labeled as not eligible to gentrify -- because it was gentrified in the 1990's.
     
Click on the link to read the entire Governing post





GOVERNING Data

Washington, D.C., Gentrification Maps and Data

To assess how gentrification has reshaped urban neighborhoods, Governing analyzed demographic data for the nation’s 50 most populous cities. Changes in several measures, described below, were calculated for each city’s Census tracts and compared to others throughout metro areas. While the methodology is similar to prior research on the subject, no universally accepted definition of gentrification exists.
Gentrification remains rare nationally. It did, however, greatly accelerate in many cities over the past decade. 
...

Not Eligible Tracts: These tracts, typically middle and upper-income neighborhoods, did not meet the initial criteria for gentrification. To be eligible to gentrify, a tract's median household income and median home value both needed to be in the bottom 40th percentile of all tracts within a metro area at the start of a decade. Tracts with less than 500 residents or missing data were also considered not eligible.


This first map is based upon the 2000 census.


This second map is based upon the 1990 census.



Beasley Real Estate partner Trent Heminger writes letter in opposition to the proposed R-4 pop-up zoning regulations

Note that Trent Heminger of Beasley Real Estate has listed at least one two-unit pop-up condominium in Bloomingdale.


F Y I .





Cafe Los Suenos' Share the Love Campaign

See this message from the folks at Cafe Los Suenos, which has a pop-up at Showtime Lounge on Saturdays and Sundays.


Share the Love Campaign
We are dedicating the month of February to building connection, community

Let us bring out your inner glow by helping us spread the love in February! Here's a run down of what we've got planned this month:
                                                                                      
  • Get connected:  Those who 'Like' us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or sign up for our newsletter in February will get one stamp toward a free cup of coffee.
  • Spread the word:  Those who post something about Cafe Los Suenos on social media will get two free stamps toward a cup of coffee.
  • We Love friends weekend:  If you bring a friend with you on Feb. 14-15, we'll offer you both 50 percent off a cup of coffee.  Plus, you'll earn points toward a free cup. 
  • Love Thy Neighbor Meet up:  Come meet your neighbors on Sunday, Feb. 28 from 11:00 a.m.-1:00p.m.  We'll distribute name tags at the door, and free cookies to put a smile on your face.

Washington City Paper HC: "Get ready for the next big development battle"

Click on the link to read the entire Washington City Paper Housing Complex article.

There have been a few false starts with the AFRH site development.  Will this turn out to be another false start?  Stay tuned.


Get Ready for the Next Big Development Battle


There's arguably no plan more contentious in D.C. than the one to build a mixed-use development on the 25-acre McMillan Sand Filtration Site. All across town, but particularly near the North Capitol Street site, you can find "Save McMillan Park" signs. Never mind that the site was never a proper park, nor that the development plans call for ample green space. The mere idea of high-density development on what's long lain fallow is an abomination to many neighbors.
                 
Now take that site, multiply it by a factor of three, move it a few blocks up the road, and you've got the next big battle.
...

WaPo: "Eighty-acre development plotted for Armed Forces Retirement Home"

Click on the link to read the entire Washington Post article.

The development of the AFRH site will most definitely impact Bloomingdale, located south of the site.


Digger

Eighty-acre development plotted for Armed Forces Retirement Home

 February 3 at 8:00 AM

With its rolling hills and forested paths, the Armed Forces Retirement Home, located on 272 acres in Northwest D.C., provides American veterans a bucolic setting in the middle of the city.
But the home is also in need of a funding source to provide for its future. And with neighborhoods on all sides booming, its managers see a real estate opportunity.
Next month the Old Soldiers’ Home, as it is often referred, will begin seeking a private partner capable of developing up to 80 acres of its campus, located between North Capitol Street to the east, Rock Creek Church Road and Park Place to the west and Irving Street to the south.
...
A plan to redevelop the former McMillan Sand Filtration plant, south of the Old Soldiers’ site, only passed a historic preservation panel and the D.C. Council after considerable community opposition in which residents requested less development and more park space.
       
The General Services Administration, which is overseeing the project for the home, says it will issue a request for proposals seeking a development partner this month. Companies will have 120 days to respond and the GSA hopes to pick a partner by the fall of 2015.
...

Ward 5 Community Happy Hour at El Camino -- Thursday, 02-05-2015

From the Ward 5 Community Happy Hour Facebook page:



February Happy Hour

February Happy Hour
Thursday at 6:00pm
El Camino DC in Washington, District of Columbia


-- So stop by El Camino this Thursday for this month's Ward 5 Community Happy Hour!

Monday, February 02, 2015

WaPo neighborhood quiz:"How well do you know D.C. neighborhoods?" -- Bloomingdale is a response to question #3

Have you taken this 10-question Washington Post quiz?

One of the responses to one of the quiz questions is "Bloomingdale."

 February 2 at 10:50 AM
...
Question #3:
This neighborhood is known for its Victorian mansions.
(The correct answer is LeDroit Park.)

LeDroit Park
Logan Circle
Bloomingdale
Eckington

Three Man Soul Machine every Thursday in February 2015 at Showtime Lounge

See this tweet and image:



xxx

Bloomingdale anxiously awaits DHCD's selection of a development team for its Florida & Q Street NW site -- perhaps an announcement this month? Or next month?




Which of the three development teams for the DHCD-owned site at Florida & Q Street NW, southside, will be identified at the winner?  Still waiting for an announcement from DHCD.
                       
Will the selected development team be:
  • Maedwell Companies?
  • Evergreen Urban?
  • MiCasa?
We all anxiously await DHCD's announcement.

Eager to hear how the selected team will finance the project, which includes 51% affordable housing.
                                         
Read this Washington Post article by area resident Shilpi Malinowski for a good summary.
                                            

more commentary on the proposed R-4 pop-ups zoning proposal (and its potential impact on affordable housing) -- from Mary Rowse and Richard Layman

                                                       
Mary Rowse is a Ward 3 resident and moderator of the Historic Washington list at Yahoogroups.
Richard Layman has his own blog called Rebuilding Place in the Urban Space.
                               
From: HistoricWashington@yahoogroups.com
To: HistoricWashington@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 02:52:11 +0000
Subject: Re: [HistoricWashington] Washington Post, Tregoning Oppose OP`s Proposed R4 Changes
   
The "affordable housing" argument is somewhat of a chimera as Washington is going through a broad repricing that is significantly pushing prices upward, as more neighborhoods become attractive at the metropolitan scale.  As neighborhoods become more attractive, the highest income segments seek to live there, crowding out those of lesser means.
    
Housing production even in the intermediate term doesn't reduce or brake prices much, because it is still outpaced by demand being greater than supply.  There is somewhat of a brake on pricing that results in "increased affordability" derived from providing smaller units, for "middle income" households, if there is a recognition that this is a much higher middle (probably between $100,000 and $250,000 annual household income) than what has traditionally been thought of as "affordable" in Washington, DC.
     
But it's somewhat fatuous to claim that keeping the housing stock fully the way it is will retain "affordability" as there are fewer and fewer opportunities to buy houses for less than $500,000 in most of the neighborhoods in the core and/or those neighborhoods particularly well served by transit., especially with historic housing stock.  This is true for all of Northwest now, and a majority of near Northeast neighborhoods.  The houses that are priced lower tend to have significant issues.
  
We are far from the days into the early 2000s, where someone could buy a house in the H St. neighborhood for under $100,000 or a studio in the Cairo for under $95,000.
    
By way of comparison, today I was in Baltimore for a walking tour as part of a conference, in the neighborhood anchored by Hollins Market, about 7 blocks from the Baltimore Hilton, but across MLK Avenue, which is a ring road on the west of Downtown.  The neighborhood also has a square, Union, with a great deal of potential.  While the houses on the square were quite attractive, we were told that prices tend to be in the range of $225,000 and significantly less.  One can find many large enough houses (somewhat messed up inside from the standpoint of preservation) for $60,000 or less.
  
Now that's affordable...
  
The R4 debate is more complicated than either the proponents or the opponents are making it out to be.  R4 houses get "broken" up into smaller units because the cost of the house as a single unit is significantly higher than most households can afford to either buy or maintain, and also results in "overhousing.".  What's affordable about that?  
But the breaking up into smaller units, accompanied by housing expansion, when done poorly and typically this is done poorly, significantly diminishes the place value of neighborhoods, even if making housing more affordable, accommodating more residents, and contributing to the economic and social health of neighborhoods.
I argue the solution is a combination of design review and restrictions based on property size.
              
Richard Layman
 
         
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 7:54 PM, "merowse@aol.com [HistoricWashington]" wrote:
                           
Here is The Washington Post's Saturday editorial opposing the D.C. Office of Planning's proposed changes in R4 zones: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-flawed-zoning-plan-would-restrict-expansion-of-housing-in-key-dc-neighborhoods/2015/01/30/154e74f0-a736-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html . The paper calls it "a bad zoning plan" and summarizes it as follows: "A proposal unveiled last year by the D.C. Office of Planning would limit the ability of property owners to expand rowhouses or convert them into condos. Neighborhoods in the R-4 zone, which accounts for about 35 percent of the District’s low-density residential lots, would see the maximum building height allowed as a matter of right lowered from 40 feet to 35 feet; condo conversions would generally be limited to two units."
 
I find it astonishing that The Post would suggest the R-4 proposal would make it harder for "affordable housing" to be built.  Perhaps we need to define "affordable housing."  Is new construction ever "affordable"?  Is there any evidence pop-ups are providing affordable housing options in any neighborhood?
 
If, as The Post says "...the most egregious [pop-up] cases have been in neighborhoods that would not be covered in the down-zoning", couldn't OP broaden the proposal to include other zones that have been affected?   
 
In her long letter to the Zoning Commission, (http://greatergreater.com/files/2015/tregoningr4.pdf), former Office of Planning director Harriet Tregoning also suggests that housing affordability will be compromised by the Office of Planning's proposal.   Is there evidence that permitting developers to pop up row houses produces "affordable housing"?  
 
While I agree with The Post that 
"...a design review process ... would help to ensure neighborhood compatibility", giving ANCs the power to do this, as Tregoning suggests, would be a disaster.  We already have a streamlined process for doing this through the D.C. Historic Preservation Office and the Historic Preservation Review Board.  Reinventing the wheel is rarely a good idea.  
 
Neighborhood historic designation is the best answer because it helps protect truly affordable housing (older, contributing buildings) from demolition.  If these buildings are demolished and new construction goes up, affordable housing disappears. 
 
It's the same with commercial buildings.  New, independent businesses are much more likely to afford the rent in older commercial buildings than in newly constructed ones.  It's not often that one sees a young, independent business in a newly constructed building, unless there's been some rent negotiation.  See the National Trust for Historic Preservation's study: "Older, Smaller, Better": http://www.preservationnation.org/information-center/sustainable-communities/green-lab/oldersmallerbetter/report/NTHP_PGL_OlderSmallerBetter_ExecSummary.pdf

Mary Rowse

The Relationship Circle at Samsara House 2023 -- every 1st Tuesday, 02-03-2015

Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 19:15:27 -0500
Subject:
The Relationship Circle at Samsara House 2023, Every 1st Tuesday, February 3rd, 7:00 - 9:30PM




You are invited to attend:


The Relationship Circle at Samsara House 2023, February 3rd, 7:00 - 9:30PM
  


Please join Samsara House 2023 in welcoming The Relationship Circle community every first Tuesday of each month!
New Year, New You!

The Relationship Circle 

Tuesday 2/03/14 - 7:00 - 9:30pm
(starts promptly) 


* * * *

at Samsara House 2023

About this Event: 
The Relationship Circle is about creating a community of mindful practice in the area of interpersonal relationships.  We endeavor to use our relationships themselves meditatively, as an avenue for personal transformation as well as creating more love, happiness, success and well-being in our lives.  We use self-inquiry to discover how we are the root of our experience and through an empathetic and powerful process, identify patterns and create new pathways for communication, action and relating to ourselves.  This can be a tremendously healing and empowering process.  For over three years, The Relationship Circle has supported people through finding new romantic relationships, creating success in their work and discovering a sense of wholeness that they experience in their everyday lives.
The group is led by Gregg DeMammos, an ontological life coach in private practice since 2006.  You can learn more at www.meetup.com/The-Relationship-Circle.com, www.relationshipcircle.com or find Gregg or the Relationship Circle on Facebook.
The Relationship Circle is a group with two main intentions.
1. Supporting each other in creating the greatest relationships of our lives.
2. Transforming our lives from the inside out by using our relationships as a resource for learning about ourselves. 
They go hand in hand.
Tonight, we'll do some super-power training together on the orientation that can add so much to both aspects.  Looking at how our relationships are going as a cue for what we can learn about ourselves.  What gifts are available to us in how our relationships go? 
This is no simple skill.  Many of us have resistance (me included!) and rightly so.  We've encountered people and circumstances that gave us a mentality that they were the problem.  This training in no way makes a judgment on who is the problem.  It's just a skill that can help you see things in a very productive way, to examine, love and perhaps drop the ways we are being that may not be contributing to the lives we want to live.  We learned many habits for the sake of safety, but those habits are rarely what it takes to thrive. 
The best word I can use to describe this is humbling.  It's humbling work.  It's the kind of humbling that we can be extraordinarily grateful for, because it releases us from results we never wanted in the first place, it empowers us in our own lives and it brings more love, acceptance and success on our terms.
I'm excited to share this conversation with you.
Minimum suggested contribution: $10 or more
 
(Please help us keep our sanity by everyone registering
and offering a contribution using our Eventbrite page)




Location
Hosted by Samsara House 2023
36 R Street NW
Washington DC 20001
Contact: 202-505-0735
  
Parking: 2hr Street parking on R Street NW, Best to park on Quincy or S Street NW.  Taking Metro is advised.
Metro: NoMa New York Ave Red line stop or Shaw green line for a short walk, or get off at Chinatown and take the P6 to Randolph Rd Stop or the 80 to Lincoln and R Street NE Stop (both stops 1 block from R Street NW).

Website: www.samsarahouse.org
Twitter: @samsarahouse
Facebook: facebook.com/samsarahouse
Add Google Event Calendar/E-mail: wakeup@samsarahouse.org

Shift Happens at Samsara House 2023
www.samsarahouse.org


About Samsara House 2023, (est. 2013)

*  "Samsara House 2023" at 36 R Street NW is an Awareness-based shared space where world-shifting communities are meshworked to experience and spread what's emerging.  Samsara House 2023 rapidly prototypes models for the new world to ignite a revolution in consciousness within ten years.

Samsara House 2023’s strategy is to exemplify a gift-economy over the market economy, one that values giving over having. While all events cost at least one dollar to cover utilities, any additional contribution will go towards periodically giving half back to a socially responsible organization or cause in need that you also help identify. Going together as a river, we build a thriving community of communities and pave the way for a new world. Samsara House 2023 is a Holacracy powered organization founded by Cullen Kowalski at a row house in Bloomingdale, New Washington, D.C.

You never change things by fighting the existing reality.  To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete. ~ Buckminster Fuller 

Be the change you wish to see in the world. ~ Gandhi

Join the Samsara House 2023 mailing list: http://samsarahouse.org
Samsara House 2023
36 R Street NW
Washington, DC 20001

Sunday, February 01, 2015

a comment about Brookland resident Daniel Wolkoff's comments on McMillan...

From a Bloomingdale neighbor:

How about a David Wolkoff moratorium?
   
I'm not sure why you are publishing comment after comment by this man, but don't you think you've given this one voice enough attention?
   
We have read his opinion. He isn't saying anything new. And, his method of writing really isn't helpful unless you are trying to incite riots or something. 

Bloomingdale anxiously awaits the Mayor's Agent hearing report on McMillan ... perhaps this month? Or next month?



The first Mayor's Agent hearing on McMillan was held on Monday, 10-06-2015.  

A continuation hearing on McMillan was held on Monday, 11-03-2015.

At the end of the Mayor's Agent hearing Part 2, the Mayor's Agent indicated that a report would be issued in a couple of month.  Not sure that is exactly what he said, but I seem to recall that it would take a few months to prepare and issue a report.  

So perhaps the Mayor's Agent may issue its report sometime in February?

Or maybe not.

But definitely on Bloomingdale's radar.  

We all anxiously await to see what it says.

Thumbs up?  Thumbs down?  Something in between?


St. George's Episcopal Church celebrates Black History Month: Daughter of the Struggle -- Sunday, 02-15-2015

Subject: St George's presents Daughter of the Struggle
From: kmarcoux@stgeorgesdc.org
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:20:56 +0000


GGW post: Bloomingdale's predominant race is Black

Did you happen to see this post from the Greater Greater Washington blog this week?

Click on the link to read the GGW post.  
  
I have only included parts of the map.
  
Note that the primary race of Bloomingdale is Black, with the exception of the square that includes Parker Flats condominium.
   

All the buildings and races of DC, Arlington & Alexandria on one map










see the latest post at the Bloomingdale History Project blog

Click on the link in the tweet below: